Mycenae and Agamemnon Essay Example for Free

Mycenae and Agamemnon EssayMycenae lies about 90 kilometres southwestern United States of Athens. From around 1600BC-1100BC Mycenae was a highly wealthy and influential city, dominating much of southern Greece. The Mycenaean season was named in reference to the city.THE DISCOVERY OF MYCENAEIt was Heinrich Schliemann who starting completely excavated the city of Mycenae. The controversial archaeologist was searching for picture that Agamemnon, the king who led the Greeks to fight Troy in the Trojan struggle. Schliemann was determined to prove that the Trojan War was a real event in fact his career was based around his desire for this. aft(prenominal) failing to find any definitive evidence in his search for Troy, he turned to Mycenae. In 1841 an different archaeologist had found and restored the Lion Gate that marks the entrance to the city of Mycenae, still Schliemann was the first to systematically excavate the entire site. He believed that the Homeric tales described t rue(a) historical events and used his discoveries at Mycenae to back this up.DISOVERIES MADE AT THE SITEDiscovered in Grave Circle A by Schliemanns police squad, a dagger line of battles the militaristic values of the Mycenaeans. From the weapons buried with most of the bodies found, we can part that the Mycenaeans were not a peaceful people. They revelled in fighting, as shown by the violent motifs on their stelae and decorative weapons. Most sculpture featured full sets of weapons, both real and decorative.We can assume that biography for the men of Mycenae would induce had a heavy focus on fighting , with men of higher positioning being shown as brave fighters. This is also shown through the architecture of the city, particularly the Cyclopean walls. These huge walls show a need for a defensive attitude, which demonstrates the Mycenaeans military attitude. On this dagger in that location is a depiction of a lion hunt, which shows that the Mycenaeans hunted for sport. Thi s further reflects the aggressive principles of the city. doubly axe and bull motifs show a Minoan influence in Mycenaean culture. Within the graves in Grave Circle A there were many objects that had been do in Mycenae but in Minoan style. This reflects an appreciation for Minoan design and an obvious link through trade and travel between Minoan Crete and Mycenae. Later the former would be conquered by the latter. In Mycenae there would have been trading of goods from Minoan Crete and an admiration of the techniques, since they were implemented in wares produced within Mycenae. The graves themselves also shed light upon burial practises and consideration in Mycenae.The graves themselves are shaft graves, 4 metres deep with the dead placed in a cist at the bottom along with many decadent grave goods. The Grave would sometimes be pronounced with a stone Stele at ground level. These stelae would be used to depict things like carry scenes, showing the heroic nature of the deceased bu ried below. The grave goods showed the status of the deceased, with gold and weapons showing a higher status. This shows that burial was not only a valued practise, but also reflected status and worth, depending on what you were buried with.The so-called Nestors Cup was a particularly important discovery for Schliemann. His team recovered the vessel from Shaft Grave IV and Schliemann identified it as the Cup of Nestor as written about in the Illiad. However the cup differs from Homers description in mo of handles, the design of the birds, and size. It also is from the wrong time to have been used in the Trojan War consort to some critics. However, this didnt discourage Schliemann from his firm belief in the Homeric tales. This is one of the many discoveries Schliemann made that he believed contributed to proving that the tales detail historical events.CONTROVERSIESWithin a shaft grave V Schliemann discovered a skeleton with a gold veil covering his face- a face which he believed was that of the legendary Agamemnon. However, in recent years critics have developed more and more arguments to the effect that the masquerade may be a hoax. William Calder gives the following reasons for his sceptical nature towards Schliemanns find The features of the mask are inconsistent with the other masks found Schliemann had considered making fakes of the gold he found at Troy to give forgeries to give to the governing body contemporaries of Schliemann allege that he planted artefacts to later discover them the excavations at both Mycenae and Troy had been unopen just a few days after the discovery of the gold, suggesting that he was expecting to find these treasures and nothing else excavations were unsympathetic for 2 days shortly before Schliemann found the mask, what could Schliemann have been doing Sophia allegedly has a relative in Athens that was a goldsmithNo other Mycenaean grave has anywhere near what was discovered in shaft grave V Schliemann had claimed he h ad excavated other finds elsewhere, when it was later revealed that he had bought them. David Traill suggests that perhaps the Agamemnon mask wasnt manufactured, but found from a later tomb. Both of his appeals for a scientific examination of the mask have been denied by the Greek administration. In response to Calder and Traill many argue that their claims are unfounded and wishing any scholarly backing, and have their own arguments in response. They insist that Schliemann was carefully monitored by Greek authorities throughout his excavation, which both Calder and Triall admit to in their own publishing.Kenneth Lapatin explains that the days where Calder alleged Schliemann had time to get a mask made, were before any masks had been found yet. Although he does admit it is possible the mask may have been enhanced after it was discovered. Both sides of the debate present both personal opinions and insinuations mixed in with actual fact. Considering the dishonest nature of Schlieman n it is easy to believe he planted the mask.But when considering the work at Mycenae alone, there is no undoubtable evidence to suggest that he was dishonest about that particular find, only rumour and hearsay. From the collections of circumstantial suggestions put forward by Triall and Calder, their theories become increasingly believable. However, some parts of their arguments seem reminiscent of conclave theories, so perhaps its best to take the mask as an important if disputed- archaeological find, but not proving the existence of Agamemnon.BIBILOGRAPHYhttp//library.thinkquest.org/25245/archaeology/mycenae.html http//www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/greecemycenae.htmhttp//mycenae-excavations.org/about.html http//www.historywiz.com/agamemnon.htmhttp//odysseus.culture.gr/h/3/ eh351.jsp?obj_id=2573http//www.uark.edu/campus-resources/achilles/age/myceneans.html http//www.archaeology.org/9907/etc/calder.htmlhttp//www.archaeology.org/9907/etc/lapatin.htmlhttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grave_Ci rcle_A,_Mycenaehttp//www.archaeology.org/9907/etc/traill.htmlhttp//www.ancientgreece.com/essay/v/greek-life-as-depicted-in-homers-epic-the-odyssey/ http//www.archaeology.org/9907/etc/dema.htmlhttp//www.greek-thesaurus.gr/Mycenaean-weapons.html